Review of Julian Reiss ’ s Philosophy of economics : a

نویسنده

  • HAROLD KINCAID
چکیده

Writing a textbook on philosophy of economics presents some hard challenges. Neither philosophy nor economics is sufficiently defined and circumscribed to make an overview easy. The nature of philosophy is currently quite contested. The naturalism movement exemplified by Quine now competes with a very traditional, conceptual-analysis trend that gives limited place to science (and thus by implication to economics). Philosophy of science—which is at the heart of naturalism— has mostly moved away from broad issues such as the nature of confirmation or explanation to a close engagement with specific sciences, in large part because it seems not all that much can be said about explanation, confirmation and the like in the abstract. Economics has grown tremendously in terms of tools and topics. It is no longer possible (if it ever was) to identify the core of economics with static general equilibrium theory. Game theory, new institutional economics, and experimental economics—all applied to an increasingly wide range of phenomena—make it nearly impossible to talk about philosophical issues in the field as a whole. Aside from these problems, a textbook in philosophy of economics confronts a problem of audience. Is the target philosophy students? If it is, then how is philosophy of economics supposed to be done for students without much knowledge of economics, especially if the goal is to do philosophy of science close to the science itself? If the target is economics students (though I doubt that more than a handful of economics departments offer such a course—mine does not), what distinguishes the course from an ordinary economics course on whatever part of economics is considered? Julian Reiss's new book reflects these inevitable tensions but largely does an admirable job of confronting them. Reiss deals with the ever larger scope and available tools of economics and with the philosophy of science imperative to engage closely with the science by covering an enormous range of work in economics in a fair amount of detail, as well

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Plea for (Good) Simulations: Nudging Economics Toward an Experimental Science

In this article, the author argues that simulation is an undervalued technique to draw conclusions about empirical phenomena in economics. If the aim is to learn about the behavior of socioeconomic systems of interest, simulations have a variety of advantages relative to alternatives such as mathematical (pen and paper) modeling and laboratory experimentation. Therefore, the author has a good p...

متن کامل

The Methodology of Islamic Economics

his paper investigates the conformity of market participants’ decisions with the Islamic codes of conduct from the economic and philosophical perspectives. At the outset, the contributions of the renowned contemporary Muslim philosophers on the epistemological issues between the “is” and the “ought” are presented. Subsequently, a synthesized construct that would resolve the dichotomy between th...

متن کامل

The explanation paradox

This paper examines mathematical models in economics and observes that three mutually inconsistent hypotheses concerning models and explanation are widely held: (1) economic models are false; (2) economic models are nevertheless explanatory; and (3) only true accounts explain. Commentators have typically resolved the paradox by rejecting either one of these hypotheses. I will argue that none of...

متن کامل

Causation in the sciences: an inferentialist account.

I present an alternative account of causation in the biomedical and social sciences according to which the meaning of causal claims is given by their inferential relations to other claims. Specifically, I will argue that causal claims are (typically) inferentially related to certain evidential claims as well as claims about explanation, prediction, intervention and responsibility. I explain in ...

متن کامل

Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Biology : A Historical Review

The philosophy of biology has existed as a distinct sub-discipline within the philosophy of science for about thirty years. The rapid growth of the field has mirrored that of the biological sciences in the same period. Today the discipline is well represented in the leading journals in philosophy of science, as well as in several specialist journals. There have been two generations of textbooks...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013